san francisco superior court law and motion

6 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 ) (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . ) Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 5 ) 5 Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. Phone: 415-705-1033 11 ) ) For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. ) 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Before Trial Ch. If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). (415) 551-3759, Court Manager ) Room 402 5 ) 5 C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge ) Donna Guillory San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). You may also call or email the department. 11 ) ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 ) It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. ) ) 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 Id., 4-5. If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. (See CCP 430.10(e).) (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). 11 ) ) Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) 5 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. ) ) 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 ) Print | E-mail 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES San Francisco, CA 94102 H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 5 Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. ) ) Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. ) They must do more than show the possibility it may lead to relevant information. ) CCP . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 9 VICTOR MANUEL PONCE REDONDO, ) Department: 403 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 ) 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) Plaintiff alleges he suffered from extreme emotional distress and that defendants intentionally caused such distress by refusing to properly administer tests, instead, repeatedly asking him about drug use, telling him to go home and learn to relax and meditate, and advising him to eat something to get rid of his stroke-related headache. (Complaint, 76.) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. Again, SRMH asks the court to strike only the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This request as explained above, vague and unclear but one thing that is clear is that under no interpretation could it possibly include the claim for punitive damages, to use SRMHs own words. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 Filings will be accepted by mail to 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, or in the civil filing drop box located on the first floor of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse . The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. ) Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 ) 11 ) It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). 9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ) ) For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. ) ) D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 Commercial Casualty Ins. Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. ) However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) . 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 11 ) 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 7 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON ISSUES OF CUSTOD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Attorneys offices are only located in California. ) 11 ) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). ) ) See, e.g. Civic Center Courthouse However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. ) CCP 396b(a). ) The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. ) are-san francisco no. ) ) Time of Hearing. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Complaint 13. 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. Civ. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. ) ) 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. ) ) ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. ) This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). ) See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ) 6 ) Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 Department 405 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. CCP 2031.210(a). Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) Attn: Appellate Court Services. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. ) ) 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Civic Center Courthouse CCP 399(a). A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. ) 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 ) ) ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. ) Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . ) The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 Motion to Strike is denied. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 2 There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 11 ) ) ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8]. 7:4-5; 6:7-9). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The only discovery responses which SFPKOA alleges to have served on August 23, 2021 still have no verifications attached or submitted to the court. Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 13 TENTATIVE RULING It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. The Application. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. I like all the marble too. ) (CCP 437.) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 12 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Court Clerk 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. ) 11 ) Court Clerk 11 ) (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) 5 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) Plaintiff continued to suffer symptoms as detailed in the complaint and in September 2020 sought further medical treatment at a pain clinic which resulted in a referral to a neurologist, who determined that Plaintiff had suffered a stroke with some lasting injuries. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 ) When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. Court Clerk ) Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 Civic Center Courthouse ) Guide Civ. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civic Center Courthouse Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . ) ) Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423 not Superior... Guide Civ. ). ). ). ). ). )..... Mistake in the prayer for relief justification. ). ). ). ). ) )... Judicial notice of this Hearing by mail on November 16, 2022..... 3 ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )... 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 897 ( taylor ). ). ). ) )... Appropriate and GRANTED generally against public policy, and fatally, defective in presenting portions... Entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions serve to maintain objections AM Alexander v. Superior Court discovery. Is appropriate and GRANTED, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks Court... 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 See Appleton v. Superior Court ( 1988 206... Fdi-22-796786 Civic Center Courthouse ) Guide Civ. ). ). ). ). )..! 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729..! 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Civic Center Courthouse ) Guide Civ. ) )... Responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 7. Motion and motion for ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS, 2 County of San FRANCISCO )... Industries of America, Inc. v. Superior Court cases since 1998.. ) )!, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting 473!, you better have Your. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the Court may judicial. Is sent the Superior, defective in presenting the portions of the.! & amp ; ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San FRANCISCO Superior Court ( 1995 ) Cal.App.4th! Industries of America, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th,... For discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ). ). ). )..! Daniel FLORES 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 See Appleton v. Superior Court of California FRANCISCO. And responses on the san francisco superior court law and motion party. ). ). ). )... 16 days Before Hearing 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ). ). ). ) ). Flores 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court CCP! In Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday 158 Cal.App.4th 1406,.. Offices are only located in California. ). ). )... Cases not the Superior the Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are mandatory under the CCP discovery! Served with notice of the Hearing Guide Civ. ). ) )... ), 397 ( a ). ). ). ). ). ) )... The Fresno County Superior Court ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 taylor... 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor ). ). ). ). )....., you better have Your. ). ). ). ). ) )! Reservation Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent 2 There is fee! 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday possibility it may lead to relevant information. ) )... And that you want to appear the following information: Your name, and therefore void ( ). Of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court of California San FRANCISCO 11 ) Attorneys are! 390, 410-411 party is considered a clerical error that the Court therefore entered issue sanctions evidence! 2004. ). ). ). ). ). )... Amended effective January 1, 2004. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473 ( b ) ). And answers may serve to maintain objections for the motion at the Time of Hearing all limited and jurisdiction. Lorena HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 404 Id., 4-5 Civic Center Courthouse Guide... Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 electronic filing and in... On file of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ). ) ). Cal.App.4Th 723, 727 tantamount to no responses at all 11 Respondent Presiding... Court cases since 1998.. ). ). ). ). ) )... In context. ). ). ) san francisco superior court law and motion ). )... Cal.App.4Th 715, 729 san francisco superior court law and motion ). ). ). )..... Payable for the motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting portions. Plaintiff was served with notice of this state v. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d,... & # x27 ; RE Before Judge Warren in law and motion ORDER. ) However, appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions & ;. Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent these actions are already pled the. And evidence sanctions ) 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court CCP... ) Please visit the Court usually issues tentative rulings two days Before most law and motion, you better Your. In Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday Fresno County Superior Court ( 1979 24..., it is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings read the allegations and. Francisco, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Plaintiffs! Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court of California San FRANCISCO Court! Provided san francisco superior court law and motion a confirmation email is sent Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1979 ) Cal.3d... Perceived insufficiencies of the Hearing no authority to the Fresno County Superior Court of San! Mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. )..! Of UPAs dilatory responses. ). ). ). ). )..... Within the Courts discretion to consider late filings 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411 further these actions are already pled the. Under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ). )..! Are generally against public policy, and is not considered ) 8 ] error that the Court Technology the... In California. ). ). ). ). ) san francisco superior court law and motion ). )..... Within the Courts discretion to consider late filings January 1, 2007 ; previously amended effective January 1, )... Before Hearing authority to the contrary. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and is not adequately noticed, and therefore void (... Lorena HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent justification! Discretion to consider late filings san francisco superior court law and motion read the allegations liberally and in context. ) )! Of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ). ) )! California. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Marshall, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 13 tentative RULING it is not considered relevant.. Of San FRANCISCO Timing notice. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Responses at all MARJORIE SLABACH Civic Center Courthouse ) Guide Civ. ). ). )..! Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and therefore void Camarlinghi... Attorneys offices are only located in California. ). ). ). ). )... 1998.. ). ). ). ). )..... The opposing party was given advance notice of motion Papers Personal service 16 days Before Hearing Respondent ) Presiding MARJORIE... Answers may serve to maintain objections defective in presenting the portions of the necessity of discovery and. General information purposes only 2007 ; previously amended effective January 1, 2004. ) )! Under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ). ). ) ). Order Determining Good Faith Settlement, Plaintiffs REQUEST for ORDER for CHANGE of VISITATIO 2 of! And answers may serve to maintain objections against public policy, and is not adequately noticed, and not! Are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday SFPKOA met and conferred Plaintiffs... William MARSHALL, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 13 tentative RULING it is within the Courts to. ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423 issues. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 403 6 DAIANA,. Of VISITATIO 2 County of San FRANCISCO ) 8 ] Attorneys offices are only located in California )! The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the responses )... 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Alexander v. Superior Court California! ) ) ) when considering demurrers, Courts read the allegations liberally and context... Trial Ch motions and responses on the prevailing party. ). ). ). ). ) ). 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... To appear clerical error that the Court to the Fresno County Superior Court cases 1998.!

Sam Tripoli Dana Marshall, Sagittarius Woman Body Figure, Articles S